Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Wizardry: Dead Means Dead

In my introductory post, speaking about the difficulties of balancing CRPGs with my busy schedule, I wrote, "If my problem was that CRPGs were competing with my to do list, they would become part of my to do list." My success in this area was made manifest over the last few days. Traveling on both pleasure and business, I didn't have any time to play, let alone blog, and (absurdly) I started to worry about how far behnd in CRPG playing I was falling. I'm back, thankfully, and continuing to try my hand at Wizardry.

Through some experimentation, I figured out how the game's "save" works. Basically, every time you end your session and leave the game, it saves whatever has happened to your party through that point, including if your entire party is dead. You cannot choose when to save and, therefore, when to reload, so death is more-or-less permanent (more on that in a sec). The really odd thing: Wizardry saves the game even if I force DOSBox to quit instead of leaving through the normal method. How does it do this? Isn't forcing DOSBox to quit essentially like killing the power?

Whatever the mechanism, the only way to preserve your save game, apparently, is to make a copy of the save file before you go adventuring. That way you can restore it if things go ill. That would be cheating, though, and cheating is against my rules.

But here's the thing that makes Wizardry unique among role-playing games: when your characters die, their bodies remain in the dungeon, and another party can "find" them! I discovered this quite by accident when my third party wandered into the room where the second party had been killed, chose to (I)nspect (I thought it was for secret doors) and found their brutalized corpses.

"Let's just check over here and see if there's any treas--....oh, yuck."


Apparently, I can recover these dead characters, get their equipment, and take their bodies up to the temple for resurrection. Unfortunately, this only helps to the extent that your new characters can survive long enough to reach the dead ones. And by that time they're probably about the same level as the dead ones, so you don't need the dead ones anymore anyway.

Still, a strategy becomes clear. I must create double the number of characters as the party will accommodate (6). Every time I leave the dungeon, I'll rotate a few out and a few more in, keeping their experience levels as equal as possible. That way, if one party is slaughtered, the other can go rescue them. Unlike Rogue, I won't need to keep starting over at level 1.

I thought you might be curious what the gameplay looks like, so I took a movie of about 4.5 minutes. When you see the cursor moving around, I'm not actually clicking on anything, of course--the game is all keyboard-driven. I'm just trying to give you a sense of what options I'm choosing.



I'll keep playing away at Wizardry and let you know what other cool things I find.

26 comments:

  1. If you happened to view the video when I first posted it, you might have noticed that it was essentially unwatchable. I took another stab at it today, so take a look again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that character death is written as soon as it happens, and that is why you can't just reboot and skip it.

    Also, you might want to hold onto the characters you end up with. Lots of later Dos-based RPGs had the option to import previous characters and use them again. Bard's Tale, for instance, could import players from all sorts of games (Wizardrys, Ultimas, for instance).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the tip. I'll avoid deleting them all, then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, this may have been covered dozens of times in future postings, but I have had quite a delightful time over the years tracking down all the games that let you import characters from other games. Wizardry definitely turns up on the list the most of all, a clear sign of its relevance. Besides Wizardry itself, you can import into TotUVI: Bard's Tale or Bard's Tale II or III, or Centauri Alliance (though there is no MS-DOS version).

      Delete
    2. It didn't make a lot of sense, though, did it? The games take place in completely different worlds and had different logistics to them.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No problem, Joseph. I appreciate comments on "old" postings. I see them all no matter what. I haven't played Diablo II; that seems like an unusual gameplay feature for a fairly new game.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. That seems a little advanced for games of this era, but I'll remember the tip when I get to Diablo II.

    As for what I do, I work in a professional capacity like you. I'm very aware that every hour I spent playing CRPGs is an hour in which I could be making money doing my job. But..."addicted."

    ReplyDelete
  8. That's interesting regarding the retrieval of bodies and loot, etc. That's not totally dissimilar to how death worked in Everquest. Well, at least in the earlier version I played.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I could swear I read somewhere that it could happen that even the temple priests can fail at resurrecting to that a dead person actually can get erased for good. Did that ever happen to you? Apparently you resurrected a lot in the temple, I must admit while playing Wizardry 1-3 I used the save file backup trick. I didn't finish them however, your review inspired me to do that and maybe without the trick just for the original experience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Manual, must get through blog posts and put up the manual...

      Delete
    2. My characters got turned to ash quite a lot, but I was usually able to resurrect them (at a greater expense) after that. I think playing W1 I "LOST" two characters to failed resurrections.

      In W5, I just reloaded backups when that happened, but in W1 I made new characters. I can't believe how much patience I had back then.

      Delete
  10. The save happens before the game tells you the player is dead. It's ingenious, really.

    Think of it like Ozymandias: do you seriously think the game would explain that you were dead if there remained the slightest chance of you affecting it? :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bored day home from work, so reading through your blog post by post.

    I must say, unforgiving as it is, the idea of finding your previous dead party is a nice touch. Not many games have that.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I love the way Wizardry handles this.

    Finding dead characters and bringing them back is often a fun quest in itself, since the characters looking for them are likely to be right around the same level as the dead characters were, and facing the same risks.

    IIRC, you needed to have empty slots to contain the dead characters, right? I seem to remember maintaining a special EMT party of 4 strong multi-dimensional characters whose only job was to quickly go into the dungeon and pick up dead people. I had as much fun playing them as I did running my main party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was actually even more to this. The game was really a static dungeon. The characters mark your progress mainly by items and levels letting them get further.

      but, it also means you can have multiple parties at different levels. Or played by different people. Remember how you had the option of setting passwords on your characters? There were several games where my dad and I had separate scenario disks so we could each be playing through. In Wizardry, we could each have our own set of characters, grab them, and head into the dungeon. The password was to keep nefarious siblings from nuking you characters. But things like this definitely happened:

      Me: dad, why is there a password on your wizard? I can't beat the level four ninja fight and I wanna tiltowait them.

      Dad: because last time you borrowed one of my characters you lost my samurai.

      Me: but most of my guys are dead in that room.

      Dad: Sigh, okay, after dinner let's take my party down and go get them.

      Games/stories on a narrative just don't have the setup for anything like that.

      Delete
  13. Yeah, Bridgeburners! Fitting, since they didn't have the best luck in tunnels under cities.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I like the rotating characters! I did something similar back in the day. Me and my entire tabletop gaming group made up all our D&D characters for Wizardry, and we mixed and matched combos while we took turns on the old Apple II. Those not playing Wizardry would get out the rule books and play a tabletop game. We were extreme gamers indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I've just started my first play through of wizardry 1. I am using an emulator and didn't realize there is no in game save. This changes things considerably. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There IS an in-game save; you just can't manually control it!

      Delete
  16. I seem to remember that when you would load your character party it would actually mark your character as dead on the disk so that if you tried the power off you would still have dead characters. Maybe that was Bard's Tale ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is correct... A friend of mine and i went into the files to try to ressurect our dead.... Very limited success. =)

      Delete
  17. There is a trick that you can use at the beginning of the game to get yourself better prepared for the dungeon. You can create multiple sets of characters, then pool your gold to one character that you plan on keeping. Once you have done that, you delete all the other characters and wash, rinse, and repeat. This gives you a ton of gold to start off with and the ability to properly equip your characters. I always attributed this to a group / Hive effort of the town trying to solve the problem, rather than calling it a cheat. =)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even if I didn't see this as cheating--which of course it is--I wouldn't do it because it would remove part of the fun of the game, where you slowly build your finances to the point that you can buy the next level of gear.

      Delete

I welcome all comments about the material in this blog, and I generally do not censor them. However, please follow these rules:

1. Do not link to any commercial entities, including Kickstarter campaigns, unless they're directly relevant to the material in the associated blog posting. (For instance, that GOG is selling the particular game I'm playing is relevant; that Steam is having a sale this week on other games is not.) This also includes user names that link to advertising.

2. Please avoid profanity and vulgar language. I don't want my blog flagged by too many filters. I will delete comments containing profanity on a case-by-case basis.

3. NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. It makes it impossible to tell who's who in a thread. If you don't want to log in to Google to comment, either a) choose the "Name/URL" option, pick a name for yourself, and just leave the URL blank, or b) sign your anonymous comment with a preferred user name in the text of the comment itself.

4. I appreciate if you use ROT13 for explicit spoilers for the current game and upcoming games. Please at least mention "ROT13" in the comment so we don't get a lot of replies saying "what is that gibberish?"

5. Comments on my blog are not a place for slurs against any race, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, or mental or physical disability. I will delete these on a case-by-case basis depending on my interpretation of what constitutes a "slur."

Blogger has a way of "eating" comments, so I highly recommend that you copy your words to the clipboard before submitting, just in case.

I read all comments, no matter how old the entry. So do many of my subscribers. Reader comments on "old" games continue to supplement our understanding of them. As such, all comment threads on this blog are live and active unless I specifically turn them off. There is no such thing as "necro-posting" on this blog, and thus no need to use that term.

I will delete any comments that simply point out typos. If you want to use the commenting system to alert me to them, great, I appreciate it, but there's no reason to leave such comments preserved for posterity.

I'm sorry for any difficulty commenting. I turn moderation on and off and "word verification" on and off frequently depending on the volume of spam I'm receiving. I only use either when spam gets out of control, so I appreciate your patience with both moderation tools.