Monday, February 11, 2019

Sorcerer's Bane: Won! (with Summary and Rating)

". . . office," I think this was supposed to end.
           
Sorcerer's Bane
United States
Wood Software Development (developer and publisher)
Released in 1992 for DOS
Date Started: 27 January 2019
Date Ended: 4 February 2019
Total Hours: 8
Difficulty: Medium-Hard (3.5/5)
Final Rating: 37
Ranking at Time of Posting: 252/321 (79%)

Summary:

Sorcerer's Bane is a shareware roguelike. The player controls a fighter, magic-user, or bard who must descend 30 levels of a former magicians' academy called Mogadore, find four pieces of a slain sorcerer's staff, and use it to defeat an evil wizard named Lodi. There are some sacrifices in typical roguelike mechanics: encounters pop up randomly; you cannot see monsters on the screen; dungeon levels are very basic; there are no complex interactions among inventory items; and there's no food system. However, these losses are balanced by some interesting encounters, an intuitive interface, an excellent "help" system, innovative ideas in item effects and encounter options, and a more interesting backstory than the typical roguelike. Length and difficulty are both set at optimum levels.
      
*****

The game wrapped up in a satisfying manner. It perhaps lasted a smidgen too long, but the problem was less "real" length than a certain amount of angst after I crossed Level 20 without finding the dragons or the evil necromancer Lodi. I then started to wonder how long the developer was going to stretch things. Fifty levels? A hundred? It turned out that the answer was 30, and if I'd known that at the outset, I probably wouldn't have minded.
         
I found all the dragons' lairs (D) on Level 29.
        
After level 10, you've left the town so far behind that you probably won't go back. It turns out that the game never develops a method for fast travel to the town. Instead, you have to rely on the rare wandering cleric and wandering trader, or--more likely--your growing inventory of wands, rings, and potions.

By Level 20, I had found pretty much every item in the game. Rings never run out of magic, so you only need to find one of each. Wands do deplete, so it makes sense to carry as many useful ones as you can. By Level 20, I had also found enough books, potions, and wishes that my attributes were all at the maximum of 21.
           
My late-game inventory has just about every type of ring and wand.
           
Enemies get a lot harder as you descend. You meet advanced undead like wraiths, specters, and vampires, different types of elementals, advanced were-creatures, spellcasters, demons, giants, and of course (ultimately) dragons. Most of these creatures have special attacks that can paralyze, poison, disease, damage your inventory, and so forth. Fighting them becomes a game of swapping inventory the moment combat starts. For instance, you want to put on a Ring of Clear Mind the moment you meet a vampire or he'll charm you and then kill you, but you switch that to a Ring of Disease Resistance if you run into a troll. A fire elemental requires an immediate donning of a Firecloak. 

A weirdly large number of enemies--including demons and most undead--die immediately if you have a Ring of Disenchantment equipped when you meet them. It's cool but it seems too easy.
            
That was a freebie.
        
All the swapping gets a little tiresome, and I admit I adopted a policy of fleeing from most encounters with certain enemies (especially disease- and lycanthropy-causing enemies) and saved fighting for the tough brutes with no special abilities, such as giants and ogres. There are a small number of enemies--particularly ghouls, harpies, and thieves--whom it makes no sense to fight at all because they teleport away if you get close to killing them.
           
Harpies not only teleport away before they die; they take your items with them!
         
It took me a while, after my disastrous encounter with a Deck of Many Things, to restore my inventory. In particular, it took a long time to find a magic weapon, and some creatures are only damaged by magic weapons. I finally gave up and used a wish to get one, choosing the "Haphestus-Made Sword" (I think the developer meant "Hephaestus"), which I think is the most powerful weapon in the game except for the "Bazerker Sword," which comes with the usual curse on that item--that is, you automatically attack everyone, including friendly NPCs.

Later, I used another wish on grizzly bear and dream wolf companions, which was pretty cool, but they didn't last long, and they can only damage creatures that don't require a magical weapon.
               
My grizzly bear and dream wolf help me against a cockatrice.
           
There are some unfortunate bugs in the game. At least, I think they're bugs. Basically, some magic items simply stop working even though you still have them equipped. Usually, un-equipping them and re-equipping them solves the problem, but not always. Regeneration was particularly troublesome. I could never get a handle on how to make it work consistently. Whether I was wearing a Ring of Regeneration, wielding my magic flute, and singing the healing song--or only some of these things, or none--sometimes I'd regenerate 10 hit points per round, sometimes one, sometimes none. Sometimes I'd only regenerate outside of combat, and sometimes only in combat. 

I used these problems as an excuse to not strictly accede to permadeath. I backed up the game every couple of dungeon levels and restored when I died. I ultimately restored five or six times, but I think except for the last two (when I faced Lodi), I could have prevented the deaths with a little more care.

The dragons--white, red, gold, and phase--were all on Level 29. Each encounter was preceded by a text screen:
          
Gotta get what I came for.
        
I tried talking to the first dragon I encountered, the gold dragon. He congratulated me for my bravery and gave me his piece of the staff after taking all of my gold (which had utterly lost any other utility by then anyway).
            
An alternate way to solve this part of the quest.
         
The other dragons weren't as nice, and I had to fight them with the appropriate magic items to protect against their special attacks. I mostly killed them with Wands of Magic Missile and Fireball, which do about 10 times the damage of my weapon. Red was supposed to be "easiest" (as a unicorn had previously told me), but he was immune to any magic, so in that sense, he was harder. I had to use a wish to restore my hit points after he nearly killed me, finally killing him after a few dozen rounds.

The backstory had made it seem like there would be some puzzle associated with assembling the staff. Instead, it simply assembled itself once I had four pieces. It then spoke to me telepathically, introducing itself as "Gilcrest."

The staff filled in the rest of the backstory. Apparently, when Sabee and Lodi created the Staffs of Power, they made them so powerful that the staffs "started polarizing the very forces of good and evil." Gilcrest became aspected to good, while his counterpart Moshannon took on an aspect of evil, ultimately corrupting Lodi, its wielder. (Gilcrest and Moshannon are both place names; who knows what they mean to the developer. Come to think of it, so is Lodi.) Gilcrest said that I'd find Lodi on the next level, and that he (Gilcrest) would take care of neutralizing Moshannon.
        
The Staff of Power is chatty.
          
Level 30 was a bit different than the others. Instead of a large open space with a few rooms, it consisted entirely of interlocking rooms. 
             
A very different look than the first 29 levels.
          
Still, it wasn't long before I met Lodi. In a bit of exposition, we both drew our staves, but the staves decided to take their fight elsewhere and disappeared. Lodi, enraged at the loss of his staff, rejected my peace overtures and attacked.
         
 
Might as well preserve all these text screens for posterity.
          
Like the red dragon, he was immune to magic. He had his own magical attacks and managed to hit me with a melee weapon almost every round. I didn't last long against him on my first attempt.

On my second, I used a wish to conjure a grizzly bear companion (leaving me with one more) and equipped a Ring of Disenchantment and a Ring of Regeneration. These things helped. He was unable to hit me with spells, and the grizzly distracted him and took his attacks some of the rounds. The "monster info" dialogue told me that he had 120 hit points, so I kept track of how much damage I was doing round after round. When he got me down to about 20 hit points, I used a wish to restore my hit points and kept fighting. But he still killed me when he had about 30 hit points remaining.
           
With my grizzly bear to take some of the heat, I did better against Lodi.
         
After reloading, I spent about 15 minutes fighting random creatures on the lower levels and opening chests until I ran into a djinn who granted me a third wish. This time, with two wishes in reserve, I was able to defeat Lodi. 
           
I guess Lodi was a load-bearing boss.
        
The endgame text revealed that I was the titular "Sorcerer's Bane." Lodi's death caused the dungeon to collapse, but the goddess Kiera appeared to teleport me to the surface. The god Allyn appeared to congratulate me and gave me a weak answer when I asked why he didn't just deal with Lodi himself: "As game master, I must expend most of my energy on maintaining the balance of good and evil in the realms."
        
I don't know if I want to live in a world where God is named "Allyn."
        
After a final plea to register the game and tell others about it (oddly truncated), I was returned to the DOS prompt.

I spent some time with the other character classes, and it's worth noting that the three classes face very different games. The choice is far more consequential here than in the typical roguelike, where a wizard can essentially become a fighter with the right equipment and attributes. Here, the "hidden" statistics--to hit, to damage, to avoid damage, alertness, and magic resistance among them--are far more dependent on class and level than attributes. A fighter with 18 strength and dexterity hits far more often in combat, and does far more damage, than a bard with the same attributes.

I won with a bard, who only ever gets three bard songs, and you almost always want to leave it on the one that heals. The spells afforded to magic users add a completely different dimension to the game. You seem to get a fixed number of slots per dungeon level, and they reset upon transitioning levels. Unfortunately, there's no in-game documentation on the spells. I only got to see a couple of levels' worth. If anyone wants to try this game as a magic-user, I'd be interested in what some of the upper-level spells do and how your experience differs from mine as a bard.

In a GIMLET, I would give it:
          
  • 3 points for the game world. It's not an epic backstory, but it's better than the typical roguelike offers (at least, to this point).
  • 4 points for character creation and development. I really like how the choice of class matters. For 2/3 of the game, character development is steady and rewarding, both in the improvement of statistics and the leveling of the character.
  • 3 points for NPC interaction. That's also a relatively high score for a roguelike. Some monsters are effectively "NPCs" and give you hints if you talk with them, and there are more explicit NPCs roaming the dungeon as healers, traders, and gamblers. The gambler with the Deck of Many Things is a particularly fun addition.
         
A creature gives me a hint.
        
  • 5 points for encounters and foes. The monsters are fantasy boilerplate, but the developer did a superb job programming in the various special abilities and resistances and then offering them to the player in the "monster info" screen. Other encounters, as documented, are fun and unusual for a roguelike.
       
The game's assessment of the red dragon.
        
  • 4 points for magic and combat. That's a compromise between what I imagine I'd give it as magic user (5) and what I experienced as a bard (3). You don't have quite the same number of tactics as the typical roguelike, and success mostly comes down to equipping the right stuff to counter the enemy's special attacks.
          
I trade blows with a vampire, with my Ring of Clear Mind protecting me from his attempts to charm.
        
  • 5 points for equipment. Great variety, easy to assess. 
  • 2 points for the economy. It's useful at the outset, but gold becomes superfluous very fast. It would have been nice if the wandering trader had sold magic items.
  • 2 points for a main quest with no choices or branches.
  • 4 points for graphics, sound, and interface. The graphics are sparse, as is typical for a roguelike, and the only sound (aside from error beeps) is a relentless blooping riff on Beethoven that you'll want to turn off immediately. The interface is superb, brilliantly anticipating all of the ways that a player might want to interact with the controls. Most commercial developers could learn something from this kid.
  • 5 points for gameplay, doing well in replayability (with the different classes), length, and difficulty. 
             
That gives us a final score of 37, a decent figure for a shareware title. Even though it lacks many roguelike elements, I enjoyed it more than the typical roguelike. 

In the first entry, I said I thought I had found the right Chuck Wood, and that he would have been 18 when the game was published. After some additional research, I believe I'm wrong and that the correct Mr. Wood was closer to 28. From what I can tell, he remained in the software business (at least part-time) but doesn't seem to have worked on any other games. I sent an e-mail to some possible candidates but haven't received any responses yet. Chuck, if you find your way here, I owe you $19.95.

19 comments:

  1. This game is a bit jokey for my taste, but it's shareware, what ya gonna do. It's a nice roguelike with different classes that I probably would have enjoyed back in the day. I like the monster memory screen. That's the most elegant solution I've ever seen to unknown monster powers. If only Dungeon Master had included that for item powers.

    Star Control 2 is next YISSSSSSSS

    OK this is a well-loved game, so commenters are going to try to spoil it for you like they spoiled Chaos Strikes Back. Be careful reading comments before it gets started. Star Control harks all the way back to the very beginning of video gaming: Spacewar. Two ships, left/right/thrust/fire, shoot the other ship. Pure video gaming awesomeness. But this gets boring with generic ships, so how about different ships with different capabilities? But then every ship has a strong personality and plays differently, and some are stronger than others. A buy system with points solves that problem. Make it team on team, so instead of one vs. one, it's 200 points of ships vs. 200 points of ships. You can even handicap one player this way by reducing his points.

    Add a strategy layer to gather resources to spend on ships, introduce a map, and you get Star Control 1. This is a fine game, probably the best Spacewar variant ever made. It is worth playing for a bit just to understand where SC2 came from. The only "drawback" is that it is best as a two-player game. There is a computer opponent but it is ho-hum and not nearly as exciting as crushing your friends.

    SC2 went in an entirely different direction. Take this Spacewar lineage and build an RPG around it. Kind of like how Sword of Aragon built an RPG out of an army wargame. The original game is still there as Super Melee. Set two sides up with point values, buy your ships or use one of the presets, and get to killing your friends. There's even a utility to ensure you can successfully press all the buttons at the same time, as in DOS some keys would conflict with each other if pressed simultaneously. I spent much happy time just doing this and ignoring the RPG part. There's something primal about two-player Spacewar. It is video gaming distilled to its essence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So pumped for SC2, but have this nagging fear that the addict will bounce completely off of it. Action combat, joystick style controls, colourblind unfriendly (even the copy protection is "Name the orange star at these map coordinates"), less traditional RPG elements than Starflight and if he's playing the remake, spotty voice acting that can't be disabled.

      I sincerely hope he DOES stick with it, but I doubt many would blame him for skipping.

      A couple spoiler free tips for anyone who hasn't played before. 1) Read the manual, there's important info inside, not just fluff. 2) The default ship control keys are a little awkward, they were designed so two sets of hands could share the keyboard, to rebind you need to launch a separate programme that's in the same directory as the main executable, KEYS.EXE IIRC.

      Delete
    2. In regards to combat, most of it can be avoided, and there's an autocombat setting that works well enough. Only downside to it is that having it on going into the final fight causes it to be skipped. In regards to voice acting if you do the remake, while there isn't a button to disable it, there is a volume slider for it, and it's possible to delete the file with the voice acting and have it still work anyway. Personally, I didn't mind the voice acting, it gave a bit more character to some of the races

      Delete
    3. I installed the first one just to get a sense of it before I started in on the second. In the first scenario, the enemy keeps building enough bases to take over the galaxy because I can't figure out how to get close enough to them to engage them in combat. Why do those damned lines only go in certain directions? And don't tell me to RTFM because TFM isn't any help.

      Delete
    4. That's part of the fun. The starmap randomizes totally and there is no easy way to know what is a dead-end and what is not a dead-end, a proxy for a fog of war in two-players game.

      You need to find your way in the maze.

      Delete
    5. Yeah, you have to find a line that lets you get to grips with the enemy. It's kind of tough to see the lines in that rotating space, but there are connections. Keep going up (if your base is down). Or play melee mode for a bit. Don't feel compelled to spend too much time on SC1, it's just a sorbet before the main course.

      Delete
    6. The combat of the original Star Control is good, but the strategic layer is terrible. As all the same ships - and therefore the same combat possibilities - carry over to the sequel, there's very little value in playing the earlier game.

      Delete
    7. Terrible? It's simple, but then again so is Spacewar. The strategic layer is just to create some different matchups that wouldn't organically occur in Melee mode. It's not as if SC1 thinks it's Civilization. The real fun is with a live opponent, but the computer player can stand and take a beating.

      Delete
    8. We played a lot of StarCon Melee, but never really bothered with the strategy part. I was not all that excited for StarCon2 until I tried it on a lark and was completely sucked in.

      Delete
  2. The question is whether he's going to play the actual SC2 DOS, or install the Open-source UQM instead. The latter has a lot of content from the 3DO version. SC2 DOS is the more genuine-for-the-time experience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When making the 3D0 version they cut a bunch of dialogue to fit their voice acting budget, unfortunately a critical hint got excised as well.

      Delete
    2. The first version I planned was the 3DO experience and I finished it legit, so I guess you can do without.

      Delete
    3. DOS version obviously. I doubt he knows what UQM is, or cares. He's all about oldschool. Besides voice acting is overrated. Just let your imagination fill in the details.

      Delete
  3. In regards to your first screenshot shot where it was oddly truncated... I like to imagine it like this: "if not enough people register, look for me at the unemployment..." *Sounds of lights cutting off, ventilation failing, powering down* "... nevermind, too late."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Congrats on beating the game, but I'm unclear, is the 8-hour playtime for a single character? It may be worthwhile to note, for future Roguelikes, both the total time spent with a game and the time the successful run took. Or that may be too much bookkeeping, since it would mean timing individual runs once you've got the game down and think they have a reasonable chance of success.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting that the Gold Dragon was willing to negotiate when the others were not. That sticks pretty close to the standard D&D dragon typing, and I wonder if this was deliberate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or maybe gold just lent itself to making an alternative solution. I doubt we'll ever know.

      Delete
  6. The dragon may have been bigger than your last date, Chet, but was it bigger than Irene's? ;)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I appreciate that even the PC gets in on the "BWAA-HA-HA" maniacal laughter. (See his response to the Vampire's mind control attempt failing.)

    ReplyDelete

I welcome all comments about the material in this blog, and I generally do not censor them. However, please follow these rules:

1. Do not link to any commercial entities, including Kickstarter campaigns, unless they're directly relevant to the material in the associated blog posting. (For instance, that GOG is selling the particular game I'm playing is relevant; that Steam is having a sale this week on other games is not.) This also includes user names that link to advertising.

2. Please avoid profanity and vulgar language. I don't want my blog flagged by too many filters.

3. Please don't comment anonymously. It makes it impossible to tell who's who in a thread. Choose the "Name/URL" option, pick a name for yourself, and just leave the URL blank.

4. I appreciate if you use ROT13 for explicit spoilers for the current game and upcoming games. Please at least mention "ROT13" in the comment so we don't get a lot of replies saying "what is that gibberish?"

Also, Blogger has a way of "eating" comments, so I highly recommend that you copy your words to the clipboard before submitting, just in case.

I read all comments, no matter how old the entry. So do many of my subscribers. Reader comments on "old" games continue to supplement our understanding of them. As such, all comment threads on this blog are live and active unless I specifically turn them off. There is no such thing as "necro-posting" on this blog, and thus no need to use that term.

As of January 2019, I will be deleting any comments that simply point out typos. If you want to use the commenting system to alert me to them, great, I appreciate it, but there's no reason to leave such comments preserved for posterity.

I'm sorry for any difficulty commenting. I turn moderation on and off and "word verification" on and off frequently depending on the volume of spam I'm receiving. I only use either when spam gets out of control, so I appreciate your patience with both moderation tools.