Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Game 121: Moria (1975)


Moria
Developed by Kevet Duncombe and Jim Battin for the PLATO system at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Development started in 1975. Copyright dates listed as 1978 and 1984.
Played today through the efforts of Cyber1.
Date Started: 04 November 2013
Date Ended: 05 November 2013
Total Hours: 6
Difficulty: Moderate (3/5)
Reload Count: 4 (characters played)
Final Rating: 26
Ranking at Time of Posting: 58/142 (41%)

It's about time I wrapped up my coverage of the earliest CRPGs that I started a couple of years ago with The Dungeon (AKA pedit5, 1975) and continued with The Game of Dungeons (AKA dnd, 1975) and Oubliette (1978). There are three more of these pioneering CRPGs left to review: Moria (1975), Orthanc (1978), and Avatar (1979). These games are collectively responsible for setting the direction of computer role-playing games for decades, by influencing the students who would go on to become the developers of the first commercial RPGs.

In contrast to the other games being developed concurrently in 1975, which were both top-down, iconographic affairs that would inspire the DND/Telengard line, Moria is a first-person game in which the players navigate a series of wireframe mazes (shown in a tiny window) to slay enemies and collect treasure. We recently had a discussion about the extent to which the developers of Wizardry had borrowed from Oubliette. Well, we need not feel too bad for the latter, because they clearly adapted much of their game from Moria. (Though we have to be careful, as the game underwent continuous development until 1984; it's not possible now to know what the first version looked like.)

A late game screen shot. Chester has encountered a witch on Level 1 of the "Caves" dungeon. You can see his active spells, equipment, and supplies on the left and his skills on the right.
 
If Moria wasn't quite the first computer role-playing game, it was nonetheless unique in that it wasn't based on Dungeons & Dragons. According to author Kevet Duncombe (in a 2007 interview with Matt Barton), neither he nor co-author Jim Battin were even aware of the existence of D&D when they began programming Moria, nor had Duncombe read The Lord of the Rings. Instead, they were inspired by the stories that the authors of The Game of Dungeons told of their development woes and decided to see what they could do with the same concept.

The game really does feel like something written by someone who had heard about D&D through the filter of another game. There are four attributes, but they're not quite like anything derived from D&D: cunning, piety, valor, and wizardry. Each exists on a scale of 0-100 rather than 3-18, and they actually increase with use--a mechanic that until now I thought appeared for the first time in Eamon. There is otherwise no experience or leveling. "Vitality" replaces hit points and magic points. All items are called "weapons," even armor.

 If any of these characteristics feel a bit odd to those used to the D&D paradigm, they are completely overshadowed by the game's innovations. In Moria, we have a lot of firsts: first to require food and water; first to allow dual-wielding; first to assign offensive and defensive ratings to weapons; first to segregate arcane and priestly magic; first to deal with secret doors by having players walk through a blank wall; and first in which groups of adventurers could team up and fight monsters together (in teams of up to 10). There are elements that we see no where else, including the ability to establish a camp for storage of excess gold and food, or the way that instead of inquiring about the cost of everything in a shop, you can tell the shopkeeper how much you want to spend, and he'll make suggestions. Perhaps the neatest element in the game is the ability to "tie a string" to a location and later instantly "follow" it when you want to return to safety--sort of a progenitor of the "mark" and "recall" spells used by later games.

There aren't many choices in character creation. You can choose from among four options, each of which gives a 10 in one skill, 7s in two other skills, and a 5 in the last one, essentially determining the starting "class" of your character (fighter, thief, priest, mage). Nothing prohibits you from using whatever skills you want after creation, though. Every time you use a skill (successfully or not) by tricking (cunning), attacking (valor), praying (piety), or casting a spell (wizardry), there's a small chance that the skill will increase a point. The chance gets smaller the higher the skill level. I imagine it must be impossible to get up to 100 in one character's lifetime; in about six hours of play, I was able to increase cunning by 10 points, valor by 13, piety by 6, and wizardry by 8.

Creating a new character on the game's main screen.

Characters age during the game. You start at the tender age of 13 and can theoretically live to 100 before expiring of old age. (If you don't quit your session after dying of old age, you can pass your items to an "heir"--your next character.) Food and water supplies are measured in months, and one month passes for roughly every 8 minutes of game time, irrespective of the number of moves you make. So a full character's life span is a maximum of 139 hours.

Since Moria is a persistent universe with other players, there's no "reloading," though you can stop play and save your character at any point by simply logging off. The game remembers his status and position when you log back in. Death, when it occurs, is permanent.

The fate of my first three adventurers, before I got the hang of it.

Combat takes place randomly in the wilderness and dungeons (not in the town) with varied enemies such as zombies, swordsmen, evil priests, reapers, orcs, trolls, dragons, devils, and elementals. The game classifies them into several categories--humanoid, undead, magic users, mythical, animals, elementals, clerics, and "lawful"--but I never really noticed a difference in their abilities or power. I could slay dragons and devils at the outset; enemy difficulty is far more dependent on dungeon level than type of foe.

In combat, you have six options: fight, "trick" (get the enemy to drop his guard for an instant kill), pray for divine intervention (including both healing and instant death for the enemy), cast a spell, "evade" (only useful with other players), bribe the monster to leave you alone, and run. Every action but running draws on the probabilities associated with one of your skills. Combat takes place in quasi-"real time" in that enemies will continue wailing on you if you just stand there when your turn comes up.

Facing a werelioni. Note the combat options at the bottom, including the ability to call for help from other players in the dungeon.

Both fighting and defending are heavily influenced by the equipment you carry. There are four types of items, all sold in the "weapon" store: weapons, body armor, head armor, and arm armor. Each item has an offensive and defensive rating associated with it, which you can easily assess with the "Inspect" command. (I played the game for a long time before I realized you have to "use" the items you buy and find to equip them. I was wondering why they didn't seem to be doing anything.) Some items require minimum skill scores to use, and if your raise your valor to 30, you can dual-wield weapons.

This turns out to be an excellent weapon for both offense and defense.

The magic system is a little primitive, yet still has some interesting spells. Combat spells are paralysis, charm, sleep, dispel magic, and magic missile. Non-combat spells are light (never had a use for it), pass-wall (very handy when trying to cut through a dungeon), precognition, and protection. There's a separate set of "prayers" (explicitly not called "spells," unlike in D&D) for combat: holy word (when successful, kills enemies instantly), escape, miracle, and "unction" (healing). Outside of combat, you can pray for replenishment of food and water. Spellcasting draws directly from your vitality, so you can't cast too many spells in combat.

Preparing to cast a spell against an "evil monk."

The outset of the game, when you have no equipment and little gold to buy it, is quite difficult, and the successful player makes judicious use of the "run" command in combat. But once the skills start to improve and you get hold of some magic items, it becomes much easier--even too easy at times. Vitality replenishes very quickly from just standing around, and monsters don't attack unless you move into their squares, so if you can defeat one combat, you can heal up easily before the next one.

Finding treasure after a combat.

By far, the more difficult challenge is navigation. The game consists of a town of 48 x 42 squares, a "wilderness area" (with doors and everything, looking just like the town) of 30 x 36 squares, and four dungeons accessible from the wilderness are: caves, forest, desert, and mountains. Each of the dungeons contains 60 levels about as big as the town. The amazing thing is that all of these levels are fixed--the creators must have used some kind of random process to generate them, but they don't change during or between games. With the sizes involved, mapping is almost a necessity, even with the "string" feature. But can you imagine mapping 242 huge areas?

My map of the "wilderness" area. It hardly makes sense to map the town since there are no encounters there. Once you know where to find the stores and guilds, you're all set.

Of course, the 242 areas are bereft of any NPCs or special encounters. We're not quite at that era yet. Instead, we get increasingly difficult monsters as we move down the levels. (The game remembers monster placements, too, such that if one character is killed by a monster, he'll still be there when you reload.) The lower the level, the harder the monster, the bigger the treasure, the higher the score for each haul. The explicit goal in the game is to achieve as high a score as possible and impress all your friends. The scoreboard lists the highest scoring player as "Quebec" with an amazing 8,590,248. I can't imagine the dedication that went into that score. In my six hours, I only achieved 448 points.

But I made the monthly record!

Of course, I missed out on a huge part of the gameplay by playing by myself; no one else was logged into the game during any of my sessions, and apparently there was only one other player all month. It's amazing to think that the third CRPG ever created was the equivalent of today's MMORPGs, but the fundamentals were all there. You can adventure as a group, with the maps organized into blocks of 6 x 6 squares in which members can move independently before the guide moves everyone to a new block. In combat, you can talk to your party or "whisper" to a single ally. If caught in a dangerous situation, you can "yell" for someone's help (even if you're not in a group), and other players have the ability to immediately respond (across great distances) to assist. Amazing stuff.

With no way to "win," I set a goal for myself to raise my abilities high enough to join a guild. You need 20 points in cunning to get into the thieves' guild, and the same in their respective skills to get into the Union of Knights, the Brotherhood, or the Circle of Wizards. Once you join, you must continue to develop your skills and donate gold to the guild to rise in rank. Each guild comes with some advantage, such as improved combat skills (fighters) or quick teleportation to other areas (mages). After about six hours of work, I had the requisite skills in both valor and cunning, and I ended up joining the Union of Knights.


The game does set a kind-of goal: to find the Reaper's Ring. Moria's otherwise-excellent documentation is a little hazy here. It says that "the ring starts on Level 1 and moves down a level each time it's found. It may be found on any terrain, so the search may be long and arduous." This suggests to me that when the game was brand new, the Ring was randomly placed on the first level of one of the four dungeons, but it's since migrated downward. Given the number of players over the last nearly-40 years, it seems impossible that it's not on Level 60 somewhere now. Certainly not an achievable goal in any manageable time frame.

Another major goal of the game is to become the master of a guild, which requires 50 in the guild's primary skill. "Master" is the third rank, and going up each rank requries the donation of $5 million, meaning that the player would have to earn $15 million for master level. In six hours of playing, I earned just over $100,000. While I did become mildly addicted to the game--watching the skill points increase incrementally is particularly intoxicating--I don't have that kind of time.

Do you suppose this means that none of those guilds ever had guildmasters?Or were they removed when their user accounts were deleted?

A GIMLET score for the game should approximate what I'd give to, say, Telengard or any other game with a bare bones plot in which the driving goal is the accumulation of wealth, the development of a character to higher levels, and the earning of points. In this case, I gave Moria:

  • 1 point for the game world. You learn the name of the place and that's about it.

The "game world" as introduced in the documentation.

  • 3 points for character creation and development. The game's approach to the attributes/skills is unique and fun, and I love that guild membership is tied to the development.
  • 0 points for NPC interaction. There aren't any.
  • 1 point for encounters and foes. The depth of the encounters is shallow and the enemies aren't well distinguished.
  • 3 points for magic and combat. Primitive, but quick and fun.
  • 5 points for equipment. A great part of the game. Lots of things to wield and wear, either bought from shops or found among slain enemies' treasures. The game makes it easy to evaluate these items, and there are neat little touches like dual-wielding and skill requirements.

The documentation for the game outlines all the weapons available.

  • 4 points for economy. Earning gold never stops being useful. You need it to rise in guild membership and to buy some of the shockingly expensive items at shops.

Any chance you have a layaway plan?

  • 2 points for quests. There isn't a man quest, but there are some goals that would be very difficult to achieve.
  • 3 points for graphics, sound, and inputs. The graphics are good for the era, especially the little monster icons. No sound, but the keyboard inputs work fine.
  • 2 points for gameplay. Though the game is definitely "nonlinear," the enormous dungeon levels, buy not containing anything interesting except combats, ultimately become a bit boring.

I'm going to add 2 points for the cooperative multiplayer options and the game's other innovations, such as the "string," for a final score of 26. (As it happens, I gave Telengard a 28, so I was pretty close.) It's an excellent score for such an early game.

Part of the superb in-game manual
 
Every time I play a PLATO game, I'm impressed with the depth of the programming and the quality of the graphics, especially considering that they were so early in the development of CRPGs. We have to remember, though, that PLATO was a powerful multi-million dollar system developed to handle complex educational lessons and to facilitate collaboration among students and professors. To accommodate engineering designs and models, it was capable of intricate vector graphics. The very software that allowed students to learn together allowed them to venture into dungeons together. Perhaps more important, it had data storage abilities that absolutely dwarfed what could fit on a tape drive or floppy drive. There was nothing like this power in the personal computer market for nearly a decade. Think of what the PLATO programmers could have done if they'd thought of things like NPCs, dialogue, game lore, and special encounters. Every CRPG lover would be signing up for a Cyber1 account instead of playing the first versions of Wizardry and Ultima.

Oubliette's borrowings from this game (assuming Moria didn't copy Oubliette in a later version) include the WAXD movement keys, the use of a capital "W" to go through a door, the secret door system, the real-time combat approach, and many of the multi-player options, including the use of a leader or "guide." I don't want to overemphasize this, though, because Oubliette introduced greater complexity in the combat, spell, and trap systems. Still, Moria is clearly the origin point for many of the elements we saw well into the Wizardry series, and I'm glad I got to experience it. Let's return to the modern era with Legend of Faerghail.

49 comments:

  1. I seem to recall an old shareware Ultima clone called Moria. Was that an entirely different game?
    Mobygames only lists one game called Moria - a Roguelike.
    So are there three different games called Moria?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most likely. I have played the rogue-like called Moria a number of times, and was actually introduced to it by my first girlfriend way back in 1991. It is only slightly different from the actual game, Rogue. It was changed to focus on the Lord of the Rings legends and since it was open source, many later rogue-likes stem from it and its LoTR template rather than from Rogue's background template. I still have a copy of it on my DOSBox directory so I can dive in from time to time.

      Delete
    2. When I saw this was a review of Moria, I was definitely expecting a different game. Didn't have any idea it wasn't the roguelike called Moria until I read it.

      Delete
    3. Same here - I also played Moria. Nowadays its Angband descendants are more popular - I played a good bit of ZangbandTK back in the day.

      One interesting thing is that Moria the roguelike (and its descendants) also have separate priest and wizard spell lines.

      I believe the original Moria was a dungeon in Tolkein, so its possible that games could have got the name independently of each other.

      Delete
    4. Yes, Moria is the name of a huge underground complex/mine/city constructed by Dwarves in Tolkien's Middle-earth legendarium.

      Delete
    5. @Deuce Traveler - You're the first guy I've heard of having a girlfriend introducing CRPGs to him. It's the equivalent of having a guy introducing the joys of visiting a nail spa to his girlfirend.

      Delete
    6. I too was anticipating Moria (the roguelike) on unix when I saw the title.

      Delete
    7. @Deuce - It's rare to find a woman who doesn't look at gaming with disgust. I don't even bother trying to explain anything gaming-related to my wife.

      But you found one who not only plays Roguelikes, but knows more about them than you do? Damn, that girl was a keeper.

      Delete
  2. Interesting title, I seem to recall that "Moria" was the crusader name for their duchy in Greece, following the 4th crusade in 1204.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, this one is probably a biblical reference (to the Temple Mount). The game refers to dwarven complex in Tolkien's LOTR.

      Delete
    2. I just assumed everyone knew it came from Tolkien. Even for those who haven't read the books, it's quite prominent in the films.

      Delete
  3. It was the "Despotate of the Morea" actually (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Despotate_of_the_Morea), but "Moria" is a village near Mytilene on Lesbos Island.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The funny thing is that Sappho AND the island she lived on have been turned into words for tribadism. Yet the only thing we know for sure about her sex life is that she was married and had a son!

      Delete
    2. You can say the same thing about Alex the Great! XD

      Delete
  4. Think of what the PLATO programmers could have done if they'd thought of things like NPCs, dialogue, game lore, and special encounters. Every CRPG lover would be signing up for a Cyber1 account instead of playing the first versions of Wizardry and Ultima.

    The same thought has crossed my mind as well. A 70's mainframe computer running PLATO could've supported some spectacularly complex and expansive RPGs compared to what early PCs were able to handle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But they didn't think of those things before the market put powerful PCs in the hands of other inventive programmers. By 1982 or so we had cheap PCs that were not as powerful as the mainframes, but were powerful enough to support reasonably complex games, and game programming was no longer the preserve of a small elite.

      Delete
  5. Fanastic glimpse at the foundations of fantasy MMORPG being laid at such an early date. Before I read Barton's Dungeons & Desktops, I believed CRPGs started on the first home computers, so that was one revelation, but getting more filled in (Moria --> Oubliette --> Wizardry) and these detailed glimpses of the actual mainframe era games is fascinating. Stuff in Moria like being able to send player-wide calls for help is mind-blowing.

    Agree it's intriguing to think of what would have happened if these games had continued to evolve on their own, hyper-powered-compared-to-home-computers track.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Random thoughts...

      Why didn't they continue to evolve? Is it because the drive to turn a game profitable was a bigger draw than creating a grand vision? Maybe the lack of control on the database also drove developers to make programs on their own systems.

      Delete
    2. That probably had something to do with it. Also, the audience was very limited, consisting only of college students with access to the PLATO mainframe.

      Still, it's not quite true to say that they didn't continue to develop. Many of the games on PLATO were still developed well into the 1980s. I need to find someone experienced with writing for PLATO to talk about its limitations, of which there might be some.

      Delete
    3. I'm pretty sure many frowned upon using such powerful systems for something as trivial as a 'game'. I do know that often games had to be hidden, so to speak, so that unsympathetic admins didn't delete them and that certain pieces of software were written to limit/regulate access to games on PLATO systems. Games and chat/IM software were the bane of many a PLATO system admins.

      I suspect that must've been a pretty major roadblock towards the creation of any sort of 'grand vision'. And, of course, as Chet says, the number of people involved in playing and especially writing games was very limited.

      Delete
    4. I'm trying to find the relevant e-mail or post, but I'm pretty sure I heard from a PLATO developer at one point who said that, yes, at the beginning, games weren't allowed, which is why the first known RPG ('m119h") and pedit5 were ultimately deleted. Later, the attitude seems to have been well, at least they're learning how to program. Everything created after 1975 seems to have survived fairly well.

      Delete
    5. I would say they did continue to develop from mainframes to BBS's to muds to mmorpgs.

      Delete
  6. This game reminds me of a pay-to-play game I played in early 90s. It was more of a MUD though on the Prodigy network.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reminds me of the original Neverwinter Nights, though that was only AOL.

      Delete
    2. I thought the original Neverwinter Nights started on prodigy before it was on aol.

      Delete
  7. duck made a respectable 2nd place in the Monthly Top Adventurers with an astounding score of... 1?!?!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Love these PLATO game reviews. I also love your new plan. Thanks so much for being our guide through CRPG history!

    Had to chuckle at this...

    "Given the number of players over the last nearly-40 years, it seems impossible that it's not on Level 60 somewhere now. Certainly not an achievable goal in any manageable time frame."

    ... says the man who managed to ascend in Nethack! :^D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, but NetHack had only 30 levels and interesting things happening on all of them. Moria has 240 levels of relatively boring content.

      Delete
  9. In the Hall of Fame picture.. what are those initials after (almost) everyone's names? I get the sense that they aren't just initialed first/middle names, since yours doesn't say "Bolingbroke, C.?."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will guess it's a guild designation. Apprentice Knight possibly? It's fun guessing... ;)

      Delete
    2. Yes, that's what it is. And "G" must be "Guildmaster," so those other guilds did have guildmasters at one point. Maybe there's a time limit, or just those user accounts got deleted.

      Delete
  10. Seems like this might be the first MUD. I remember spending way too much time telneting into a nearby college's bbs to play a version of Crimson MUD. Also super excited for LoF a friend had this and I thought it was the coolest thing. There was a weird bug that I'm curious if you'll stumble upon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There does seem to be very little to distinguish RPG from MUD on these early mainframes.

      Delete
  11. I'm just excited we've finally reached Faerghail! I remember this game being amazing, I can still hum the intro music to this day. Of course, that was on the Amiga, so the DOS version may not have it. Either way, it's hopefully as good as I remember.

    -BelatedGamer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well....I'm not sure you're going to like my first post. That doesn't mean it won't get better.

      Delete
    2. Ouch. Well, I suspected my love for the game may mostly be nostalgia. Ah well, I can live with that. Hopefully you get some degree of satisfaction from it.

      -BelatedGamer

      Delete
    3. I kind of poked at it recently via Abandonware and couldn't get into it. That just means I couldn't get into it, not that it's bad.

      Delete
  12. When I played Faerghail back in the days on the ST, I felt it was extremely average and little more than a Bard's Tale clone. Very repetitive is what stuck in my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Very enjoyable read. I'm studying CS at UIUC right now. There's PLATO stuff everywhere. These aren't the accomplishments that are emphasized, howver :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Another apparent first for Moria, and something Oubliette apparently copied from it, is the monster types. That probably seems like a minor thing, but I think it's kind of interesting in that, like I said in a comment on the Oubliette post, D&D 3E years later not only used monster types but used many of the same names for them (animal, elemental, humanoid, undead)... though, again, I'm not claiming D&D 3E actually took the idea from Moria or Oubliette; it's certainly a concept that could be arrived at independently. (Though now I'm kind of wondering if any of the D&D 3E designers went to UIUC...)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I probably didn't highlight it, but those monster categories were listed all the way back in the first extant PLATO RPG, "pedit5" or The Dungeon, which listed them as "evil men," "goblin-types," "monstrous animals," "undead," and "mythical creatures." So I'm guessing that The Dungeon was influenced by D&D, The Game of Dungeons was influenced by The Dungeon, and Moria was influenced by The Game of Dungeons.

      Delete
  15. Huh, I was just reading about the trick they use to make those dungeons. At least, what i assume is the trick. You write a random dungeon generator, then use a set seed instead of a random one (So you always get the same sequence of 'random' numbers in the same order.) Then you get 'random' levels that are the same each time. Elite uses the same trick to generate universes. Today Dwarf Fortress uses a similar trick, so that users can share worlds with one another.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Late for this but. If you go on the cyber1 network into either vavatar or zavatar, you will find plenty of programmers and players from way back when to answer questions and provide insight I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  17. OK,didn't see the don;t use "Anonymous" post until after I posted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No problem. It's more of a request than a rule.

      Delete

I welcome all comments about the material in this blog, and I generally do not censor them. However, please follow these rules:

1. Do not link to any commercial entities, including Kickstarter campaigns, unless they're directly relevant to the material in the associated blog posting. (For instance, that GOG is selling the particular game I'm playing is relevant; that Steam is having a sale this week on other games is not.) THIS ALSO INCLUDES USER NAMES THAT LINK TO ADVERTISING.

2. Please avoid profanity and vulgar language. I don't want my blog flagged by too many filters.

3. Please don't comment anonymously. It makes it impossible to tell who's who in a thread. Choose the "Name/URL" option, pick a name for yourself, and just leave the URL blank.

Also, Blogger has a way of "eating" comments, so I highly recommend that you copy your words to the clipboard before submitting, just in case.

NOTE: Spam has gotten so bad lately that I've had to turn on comment moderation for posts older than 10 days. I apologize if it takes a little while for your comment to appear.