Tuesday, February 3, 2026

The Results Are In (Part 1)

 
Readers validated my preference.
         
I waited until I didn't get a response for 24 hours to analyze the results. Overall, I got 615 responses, which is about half of the unique visitors per day, but about two-thirds of unique visitors who stay for more than two minutes. That's not a bad response rate. Shame on the rest of you.
   
Here are some top-level results:
   
Game of the Year 
    
Betrayal at Krondor fans may have been vocal in the comments, but on the survey, it got fewer votes than "no opinion." The plurality went to Dark Sun, with 40% of total votes and 49% of those voting for one of the four nominees. The second-highest number of votes were from those who wanted me to award "Game of the Year" two years in a row to the Ultima Underworld series. I get the sentiment; the games are that ground-breaking.
       
Votes for "Game of the Year."
        
There were impassioned write-ins for Quest for Glory: Shadows of DarknessLands of LorePerihelion, Ultima VII, Part Two, and Unlimited Adventures. I agree these were all good games, but I think I covered why I felt they were not GOTY-worthy.
   
In the end, I'm going to go with my original inclination to give the award to Dark Sun. It is what I like most in a role-playing game: Lots of statistics, tactical combat, inventory upgrades, dialogue options, meaningful encounters, and a setting that fires the imagination. To get a perfect 100, a game just needs to do more of these things. 
 
Where You Come From 
 
Okay, mea culpa: I should not have conflated "where do you live?" with "where are you from?" Nor should I have conflated "country" with "nation" (man, are some people sensitive about that).
   
There were some surprises here. I figured at least half of my readership was from the United States, but it's only 38%. The second-highest number of readers are from Germany (13%); that article in Der Spiegel really paid off. The expected succession of English-speaking countries follows, with Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia all between 3% and 5%. Finland, Poland, Spain Austria, Italy, Brazil, Sweden, and France all contributed between 10 and 20 readers and 1-3% each. There's a very long tail of countries with less than 10 readers and less than 2% of total readership. On the entire continent of Africa, I have one reader in South Africa. I also have very little readership in Asia, aside from four in Japan, one in Singapore, one in Malaysia, and perhaps one in Türkiye depending on where he is.
         
I need billboards along the silk road.
            
Here's something that I thought was an oddity: Except for one reader from Peru who insisted on the grave over the "u," not a single reader rendered the name of their country in native form. That is, I didn't get a single Deutschland, Polska, or España, with or without the tilde. Now, I know that you all knew that you were responding to an American survey, but it makes me curious how often the natives of a country use exonyms even to themselves. In the United States, no American would ever think of his country as Los Estados Unidos unless he grew up speaking Spanish, nor would he say Les États-Unis in conversation with another American unless he was making some sort of affectation. I would bet that fewer than 5% of Americans are even aware of Měiguó, Yhdysvallat, or Bandaríkin, among many others. Is this the same in your country, or do Germans casually use "Germany" even to other Germans?
    
I remember saying this before in a random entry, but it has continually surprised me, in this era of personally-defined pronouns, person-first language, and land acknowledgements that some movement hasn't arisen to eliminate exonyms. Other than Türkiye, I've never even heard of a country that seems to care.
      
That's why I write my blog in Tennessee.
       
In the United States, I have readers in all states except Arkansas, Connecticut, Mississippi, North Dakota, and Rhode Island. The totals mostly follow population trends, with Texas and California at the highest (which is impressive, as I forgot to add it to the selection list for the first 25% of results). None of our territories are represented except for one reader in American Samoa. I have only one respondent each from the two states that matter most to me, Maine and Louisiana.
      
Sex
    
Well, there's no avoiding it: the CRPG Addict may as well be a frat house. At least 92% of readers are men. I have fewer women than those who didn't want to give their gender at all. I have almost as many readers who identify as non-binary than I have women.
    
This imbalance raises two possibilities. One is that my readership is simply reflective of the overall RPG gamer population. I went searching for statistics on the issue and found various sources that estimated the overall computer gaming population at about 50% women but the population of RPG players specifically closer to 18-25%. (I put this aside to research more later; I'm declining to cite sources because I don't want to get into a long argument about validity right now.) Either way, that's a lot more than the 3% who responded to my survey.
       
However you look at it, this blog is a sausage party.
       
I'd be interested in any follow-up comments (feel free to email directly) from women readers regarding their thoughts on the disparity. I feel like the commenting system successfully hides the commenter's sex (unless you're commenting with an account that includes your actual name), and in 16 years of doing this, I've never seen any gender-based comments between readers, certainly nothing that would rise to the level of harassment or "toxic masculinity" or whatever. I like to think my own writing is relatively free of anything that would turn away women specifically, but let me know if I'm fooling myself.
 
The relationship between player sex and chosen character is interesting. Of the 17 women who responded to my survey, 15 preferred to play a female character (one didn't care, and one preferred a male character). Male respondents, on the other hand, were 21% likely to prefer a female avatar, and another 34% were at least open to it (the remaining 44% preferred men). Non-binary respondents generally preferred "the opposite sex" (67%), which I don't quite know how to interpret. (The fault is mine, of course, for not leaving enough options on the question.)
 
Your Favorite RPGs
       
This one took a lot of data-cleaning, as I made it a free-text field. If you put two games, I counted them both, but if you put more than that, I just counted the first one. In the end, I'm pleased to say that Baldur's Gate was the clear winner with 38 votes, followed by its sequel with 37. Number three was also an Infinity Engine game: Planescape: Torment. The Top 10 list includes only one game that I've never played (the original Fallout) and otherwise aligns well with my own idea of the best RPGs.
        
Your favorite games.
       
The list is definitely biased towards older games; the only candidates in the last decade are Baldur's Gate 3 (10) and Disco Elysium (6). Having just finished Pillars of Eternity, I was surprised that I didn't get a single vote for it, although there is one for its sequel. I really enjoyed the first game, particularly the depth of its lore, its replayability, and its role-playing options. (I looked at a walkthrough when I was finished and discovered that I had missed three joinable NPCs.) I confess I didn't know half of what was happening in combat. 
 
     
Other Findings
    
  • The average (mean and median) age of readers is 45, which makes sense given my content. 87% are between the ages of 37 and 56. Only 13% are at or above my own age of 53. I have no readers under the age of 19 and only one over the age of 68. I would like to hear from that 81-year-old reader. You would have already been an adult when the first commercial RPGs were released; how did you get into what was, at the time, a young person's hobby?
        
Our heavily-clustered age distribution.
       
  • Most of my readers are long-time readers. Half of them started reading before 2015. The mode (71 readers) was 2012. 62 people (the third-highest total) have been with me since the first year. I gained only 14 new readers in 2024 and only 13 in 2025. I wonder if I should do something to ease new readers into the blog; comments are welcome there.
  • Well over half of readers check in every 1-3 days, though they're divided by those who read everything (34%) and those who pick only the ones they care about (22%). I guess an awful lot of people are still getting the blog via RSS, which I should have asked about.
  • Only 4 respondents use a translator to read the blog. For 52%, English is your first language, and for 47%, you read the blog in English anyway. 
  • Not a lot of duplication on favorite entries. The highest-voted was 6, for my winning entry on Ultima VII: The Black Gate; another four voted for the "Summary and Rating." Fate: Gates of Dawn showed up a lot, but for different entries. 
  • A third of respondents have never commented, and half commented only "very rarely." I enjoy my frequent visitors, but it's a sign of a healthy blog to have a diversity of comments. I encourage those of you who never or rarely post a comment to do so occasionally, if only to highlight something you agree with. No blogger can get enough of those.
  • People overwhelmingly (74%) felt that my standard goal of one entry every 2.5 days was just fine. Part of me wants to hear more from the dozen or so respondents who think that goal is "far too little." You have time to read 2,500 words a day?
  • Respondents were supportive of occasional guest entries, which corresponds well with my plan.
  • Of respondents who even knew what I was talking about, 79% of them were perfectly okay with taking a filet mignon, putting it in a blender, and serving it as a shake. Well, technically, the question was about soft-serve ice cream, but it's basically the same thing. Here's a good article for you soft-serve lovers, by the way.
  • 38% of my readers prefer sweat to sweaters. 
  • Among my readership, I have 44 game developers and 7 game producers or executives. I assume we're just waiting for the ink to dry on those consulting contracts. 
  • Most of my readers are non-religious of one type or another, to a far greater extent than population demographics would predict. I wonder if I've just scared away most of the believers with my ungodliness.
  • I'm saving responses on virtue, ethics, and religion for a juicier posting later on. 
  • My default character is usually a paladin, which was the second-highest vote-getter among respondents (111). Mages were first (199); druids (23) and priests (24) were lowest. My apologies for not including a "ranger" option, though. 
  • Readers are well-adjusted when it comes to the amount of time they spend on games. 43% would like to spend more time gaming, and 38% are comfortable with the time they currently spend.
     
I'm still working on some of the more complex questions, but I thought I give this to you to chew on in the meantime. 

44 comments:

  1. I didn't quite finish the survey. :( I felt like I was only on disk 2 of 3.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah I lost steam too -- I did about half of the survey and then meant to come back to it later, but never did.

      Delete
  2. I really like the Pillars of Eternity series, It's lore is pretty fun though occasionally overwhelming. I know I was one of the original Baldurs Gate votes and that's largely because there is no game that is more likely to make me just one day be like, I need to play this again. I know it's sequel is probably the better game on a technical level but there is something about those early levels that feels more satisfying to me gain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I absolutely loved the lore of PoE (Morrowind-quality) and how it intersect with its unique “Cipher” class, but the game is way too wordy for its own good, and its ruleset is really “we have D&D at home”. The last third of the game also force you to interact with Generic Elves that are even more logorrheic than the humans, so it was a huge letdown. The DLC was a bit more great lore and a lot more of repetitive combat.

      It ended up below my personal “recommended” threshold unlike, well, other cRPGs in your list or not in your list.

      Delete
    2. I played both Pillars games on easy difficulty in RTwP mode with a chanter PC as kind of isometric "hiking sims" - just exploring pretty locations and enjoying the intricate lore and letting the combat resolve itself. More recently, I decided to replay Pillars 2 properly - in TB and paying attention to mechanics. And dropped it after ~5 hours because of just how mind-numbingly boring those mechanics are.

      Delete
    3. "way too wordy for its own good" lord I wish games were more cognizant of this problem. Unfortunately it seems to be getting worse.

      Delete
    4. A shame in my opinion that the 2nd part is a little forgotten. I will say though that combat was indeed a little boring EXCEPT for those special 4 optional encounters in PoE 2, that seemed impossible to me, or at least, I didn't want to rise to the skill level after waltzing through the main game at first.

      Delete
  3. completely get the bias for classic games, I love them too. Disco Elysium has the best writing and narrative of any game I've ever played, though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like the microwave popcorn method of determining when the survey was done.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not sure how I feel about being the only respondent from Louisiana, so I have chosen to feel special.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can't remember if I said Pillars 2 or Fallout 2. It's hard to just pick one. I adore Pillars 2 though.

    In terms of getting new readers, I can't think of what you could do other than to figure out a way to talk about more modern/"new" games. I think that would be cool but not if it got in the way of the bread and butter.

    I'm one of those long-time readers who rarely comments. Will try to do so more often. Sometimes I can't leave a comment on mobile (which is how I usually read new entries) so I just give up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I only read on mobile, and yes, commenting is very hit or miss. I usually go for name/url, but then I don't know if anyone replies ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      Delete
  7. I think the bias towards older CRPGs for favourite is natural, depending on what it is you like best about CRPGs. As someone who enjoys RPGs mostly as books I can play, story and characters remain most important to me. Baldur's Gate 2 nearly hit the peak of what that can be in video in 2000. While Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous took the same basic formula 2021 and improved slightly on combat and overall story, the characters can't match BGII's. I won't be quoting anyone from Wrath of the Righteous in 20 years like I still do Minsc or Tiax.

    I feel that it's like that for a lot of aspects of CRPGs. Few games have world-building like Fallout, but the ones that do like Pillars of Eternity, can't quite match it in other aspects, like character building. The games that can match the classics on their finest attributes are often being made by smaller teams or solo devs these days and it means they often can only focus on one aspect of what made the classic they're emulating great.

    I think it also is largely dependant on why you play games. I use video games as escapism from a world outside that is often horrible. I want to play an RPG where the good guys win and the day is saved. I don't want to play an RPG where my character is a depressed alcoholic who may kill himself if things go wrong, despite how amazing the characters and writing in Disco Elysium are.

    It probably doesn't hurt that classic games are from a time when the world didn't seem like it sucked so much, so there are less negative outisde memories associated. Not to mention as someone who was in his teens when Baldur's Gate 2 came out, I couldn't buy a lot of games so Baldur's Gate 2 defined a year of my life. Older and with disposable income, Wrath of the Righteous was a large part of my life for the month I took to beat it, then I started the next game I owned and it immediately was replaced as my focus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wholeheartedly agree with this the main thrust of this comment. For context, I voted for PS: T on the questionnaire. And it's not like I don't enjoy later CRPGs, I truly do. But while both BG3 and Disco Elysium are truly great games, as are others that didn't even make it onto the list, like KoTOR 1 and 2, Bloodlines, NWN2, Tyranny, and the Pathfinder series, none of them are quite as finely balanced in their virtues as the classic Black Isle and BioWare gems. I'm pretty certain that's not just irrational nostalgia, as I beat the original BG for the first time just a few years ago, and while I did go through PS: T shortly after it came out, I came back to it several times years and decades later, and it was as good, if not better, as it was back in my youth.

      Incidentally, your GoTY '93 still ranks surprisingly high on my personal list of games I enjoy to this day. I loved it when I played it back in the nineties, but I also appreciate how it presaged in many ways the masterpieces that came out a few years later.

      Delete
    2. I mean, it's a blog about older RPGs. Why would you read a blog about older RPGs if you prefer newer ones.
      If anything, I'm surprised that the vast majority of the games that make the top are so recent.

      Delete
  8. I'm from CT but I didn't know about or was too busy to do the poll. One of those. Early 50s and my favorite cRPG is.. probably either Pool of Radiance, Ultima 5, or Fallout 2. Been reading for years but rarely comment to the point I don't really even log into my Google account.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am really puzzled about your question on country-naming. When you are talking French, I surmise you say “Je viens des Etats Unis”, not “Je viens des United States”. Similarly, when speaking English I say “France”, and when speaking French I say “France”

    … wait, it does not work. Anyway, I say France, Franța, Francia and Frankrike as circumstances require.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. - And where are you from?
      - 中華民國
      - I see

      Delete
  10. Yeah, age and sex stats track with surveys our company occasionally puts out. I think your readership is a bit more male than our players, because old RPGs (and games in general) before Baldur's Gate were mostly men's domain. Once RPGs with romance options began to show up, gender ratio changed a little :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Quite a strong result for Ultima V as a favorite RPG for people. Not bad for an 1988 game. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 1-2 punch of Ultima IV and V is still among the most interesting and well fleshed out CRPGs. Taking everything that was important about IV and turning it on its head was genius. I can’t think of any other duology of CRPGs that left such a strong combined impact. Sure, Baldur’s Gate 1&2 or Fallout 1&2 are individually better games, but their sequels are “just” better versions of the prior game, not really something that makes me re-interpret the first one. Curious if there are any other two games like that?

      Ultima V is so much better because Ultima IV exists.

      Delete
    2. Surprisingly, this punch also works if you play Ultima 6 first (which has the virtues nicely displayed in the eight cities) and then Ultima 5 (with its blatant "follow the virtues Or Else" philosophy).

      Delete
    3. U4 was my vote there. Glad to see I was joined by 11 others. I'm sorry that so many other folks were just plain wrong. ;) More seriously, yeah - the U4+U5 combo was and is a strong one, although the non-combat ending of U4 still resonates with me today.

      Delete
    4. I'm with you guys, I could've easily voted for both as well. The whole series from 4 up to 7 has a special place in my heart that's why 8 back then felt so...well..brutal for the lack of a better word.

      Delete
  12. I always read your reviews. I never saw the poll. Clearly you snuck it in for paid subscribers. That's hardly representative of your viewership.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Glad to see at least a couple console games ended up in the list even if there are better Final Fantasies

    As for the sex question, technically I lied by saying I'm female, but only because I'm trans and see sex and gender as seperate things. It's possible that's related, but it's also just as possible that it's because the blog covers games from an era where gaming in general was primarily seen as being for the boys, and the reader age distribution makes me think most of them are here to remember the games of their youth which means that's gonna be heavier on the guys.

    Meanwhile, I'm one of the readers in their late 20s, and I'm here because I like retro games in general, and computer games have always been a bit of a blind spot for me. I grew up on consoles and for the most part the computer was the thing I used the internet for, and the games were stuff like Rollercoaster Tycoon or SimCity 4. Even after I got a CRPG around the time Skyrim came out (Morrowind specifically) it was a few years before any of them actually clicked with me, and even then I still jive better with consoles over PC. Unfortunately I prefer Nintendo and that results in things like it being extremely unlikely I'll ever end up playing Baldur's Gate 3... although at least I'll finally be able to try Cyberpunk

    ReplyDelete
  14. A long time reader, first time poster, I found picking a favourite game almost impossible. I’ve probably played through Baldurs Gate more than any, but did I love it more than MM3, 5, 6 or 7 or more than either Fallout? Or Curse of the Azure Bonds? Let alone both Pillars , Neverwinter Nights, Ultima Underworld or U5 or U7 or gosh, the Divinities or Planescape or Dragon Age and on and on - does Mass Effect count? That’s the beauty of the genre, that’s there’s so much diversity and while a lot of utter trash, so many gems and to this day so many rewards, although it’s fair to say my wife tends to differ.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The median/mean age is a year OLDER than me! Cripes.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I enjoy reading about these old crpgs, partly for nostalgia, but mostly because I don't have the time (or sometimes patience) to play them anymore. I also didn't have a PC, so couldn't play most of these (went from Atari ST to obsolete PC (only for music making) to Mac, so I've missed out on most of the games Chet plays.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "I should not have conflated "where do you live?" with "where are you from?" [...] (man, are some people sensitive about that)"

    I was going for gleefully pedantic rather than sensitive. But yeah, being an immigrant, it's kinda hard not to have strong feelings about those things.

    "Is this the same in your country, or do Germans casually use 'Germany' even to other Germans?"

    When speaking *English*? Yes, absolutely, why wouldn't they? You use the name of the country in the language you're currently speaking. That's also why the whole Turkey debacle is so ridiculous.

    US-style enthusiastic patriotism is also a bit of a mauvais ton on this continent - for obvious historical reasons. Nor is identity politics as big of a thing, for better or worse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, and this: "You have time to read 2,500 words a day?" - I don't see why not, that's, like, a 15 minutes read. I usually do that over a meal.

      Though I admire your ability to write that much. For me, writing 2500 words takes two full 8-hour working days.

      Delete
  18. "Except for one reader from Peru who insisted on the grave over the "u," not a single reader rendered the name of their country in native form."

    What do you mean? I rendered both my country of origin (Venezuela) and the country I'm at (Chile) in its native form — and I'm pretty sure the other commenter from Chile did the same.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "Most of my readers are non-religious of one type or another, to a far greater extent than population demographics would predict. I wonder if I've just scared away most of the believers with my ungodliness."

    As someone who had a very religious upbringing, but then broke off to atheism in adulthood, RPGs were very taboo in the childhood world I came from (satanic panic, etc.). The adults around me believed that supernatural forces were real, and play acting this stuff was dangerous, or at the least not edifying.

    I'm sure there's more to it than this. I'd guess that other religions weren't nearly so hostile as mine. And it's probably not a coincidence that I was the rare kid in that community that secretly was into this stuff anyway and also moved on from religion as an adult. There's probably some psychological trait that contributed to both.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'd love to comment more, but the choices for non-anonymous posting are somewhat sparse: Google Account (I really don't want to use that) and Name/URL (don't have a website nowadays).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can leave the URL space blank and just enter a name.

      Delete
    2. But what would the Avatar say? Is it ... virtuous?

      Delete
    3. AlphabeticalAnonymousFebruary 3, 2026 at 8:07 AM

      It's as virtuous as anything else, but definitely more tedious.

      Delete
  21. I get fed these posts from an RSS reader (feedly.com, in fact). It's actually hard to imagine NOT using a feed reader in some way to keep up with blogs. I know for a fact that I'd never take the time to individually check on all the blogs I'm interested in. This is pretty much the only one where I'm interested (and participate) in the COMMENTS as well. Even where it may not be intentional, it's very hard to break into some blogosphere communities for some of us (within the blog itself or Discord). However, the Addictsphere is a good place with good people, or so it feels to me, who are passionate about this topic.

    The skew to older men isn't surprising at all, given the narrow topic, although it would be good to at least see the numbers get closer to the industry averages. Sadly, I can't speak to any reasons: it doesn't feel like a sausagefest in the comments, except again in the topic itself, but we're the worst ones to make that judgment. (My wife doesn't get computer gaming OR role playing gaming in the first place, much less both combined, so she'd be the last person I'd get a valid response from on reasons.)

    I'm happy to see Dark Sun win GOTY, even though I voted for UU2. It's been a long time since I played DS (vs. a replay of UU2 four years ago), but I recall it being a very good game. It's in my GOG library awaiting its first re-play since it came out.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Us Germans, we "get" you, I'd say.
    Though I wonder, if you realise that the blog naturally attracts middle-aged people, and so requires an historically grown RPG community, so that Germany is simply the 2nd biggest market.
    I'd assume that Brazil is a relative newcomer, that Japan is naturally more focused on their own home-grown RPG culture, and other bigger countries have other reasons for not featuring quite THAT much.
    But yeah, Germany was pretty quick on the RPG train, and developed their own alterantives to D&D, as you can see with the game you play right now.

    ReplyDelete
  23. We Germans don't use use the English name for our country when talking among ourselves. We only do that when talking in English.

    ReplyDelete
  24. "in 16 years of doing this, I've never seen any gender-based comments between readers, certainly nothing that would rise to the level of harassment or "toxic masculinity" or whatever."

    I remember some loser asking a female commenter if she wants some moorcock. Don't have a clue what entry it was though.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I'm not only a Christian, I'm also a teacher of religious education (regular school subject here), and your ungodliness has yet to drive me away. And your defaulting to a paladin tells me that deep down, you are a virtuous man. Or you just like to smite undead.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I typically have about 10 hours a night at work when I can be reading your blog. So get cracking. J/K. At this point I have almost read every post. I will say this, doing it on mobile feels like being a bastard step-child

    ReplyDelete

I welcome all comments about the material in this blog, and I generally do not censor them. However, please follow these rules:

1. DO NOT COMMENT ANONYMOUSLY. If you do not want to log in or cannot log in with a Google Account, choose the "Name/URL" option and type a name (you can leave the URL blank). If that doesn't work, use the "Anonymous" option but put your name of choice at the top of the entry.

2. Do not link to any commercial entities, including Kickstarter campaigns, unless they're directly relevant to the material in the associated blog posting. (For instance, that GOG is selling the particular game I'm playing is relevant; that Steam is having a sale this week on other games is not.) This also includes user names that link to advertising.

3. Please avoid profanity and vulgar language. I don't want my blog flagged by too many filters. I will delete comments containing profanity on a case-by-case basis.

4. I appreciate if you use ROT13 for explicit spoilers for the current game and upcoming games. Please at least mention "ROT13" in the comment so we don't get a lot of replies saying "what is that gibberish?"

5. Comments on my blog are not a place for slurs against any race, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, or mental or physical disability. I will delete these on a case-by-case basis depending on my interpretation of what constitutes a "slur."

Blogger has a way of "eating" comments, so I highly recommend that you copy your words to the clipboard before submitting, just in case.

I read all comments, no matter how old the entry. So do many of my subscribers. Reader comments on "old" games continue to supplement our understanding of them. As such, all comment threads on this blog are live and active unless I specifically turn them off. There is no such thing as "necro-posting" on this blog, and thus no need to use that term.

I will delete any comments that simply point out typos. If you want to use the commenting system to alert me to them, great, I appreciate it, but there's no reason to leave such comments preserved for posterity.

I'm sorry for any difficulty commenting. I turn moderation on and off and "word verification" on and off frequently depending on the volume of spam I'm receiving. I only use either when spam gets out of control, so I appreciate your patience with both moderation tools.