Saturday, August 28, 2010

Game 23: The Shard of Spring (1986)

Oh, good! This game will feature swords, treasure chests, scrolls, and...uh...dreamcatchers?
The Shard of Spring
United States
Strategic Simulations, Inc. (developer and publisher)
Released in 1986 for Apple II and Commodore 64; 1987 for DOS
Date Started: 28 August 2010
I go from one SSI game directly to another. I don't know whether this was released before Rings of Zilfin or not--just that they were both released in the same year. Shard of Spring feels in many ways more like an SSI game; you can feel the transition between Wizard's Crown and Pool of Radiance happening here. The creators are Craig Roth and David Stark, who worked on this and it's sequel, Demon's Winter (coming up in 29 games). (Roth now seems to be a technology analyst, and Stark's name is too common to figure out where he is now.) The main game screen seems proud of the fact that it was "written entirely in Microsoft QuickBasic v. 3.0," which I gather is something like writing an orchestral composition for a kazoo. First, the back story. Here's the first line from the manual: "For two centuries, as the rest of the land lay baking in the desert sun or freezing in the winter wind, the small island of Ymros enjoyed an eternal spring." It transpires that someone called the Red Sorcerer decided that Ymros was too special to go through normal seasonal changes like the rest of the world, so he used sorcery to enchant a piece of the LifeStone and twist the world's climate and environment to his whim. He stuck this enchanted Shard of Spring in a crystal in a place called the Green Shrine. While the rest of the world suffered the regular vagaries of nature, the people of Ymros enjoyed continual spring. How they grew any food is left uncertain--presumably they used similar sorcery to just steal it from other lands. 
Suck it, mainland!
Some centuries later, an environmental crusader named Siriadne sent some of her followers to destroy the shrine and take the Shard. She then levied a punitive fine against the people of Ymros for benefiting from these dark arts for so long, demanding gold and food instead of turning Ymros into the "icy wasteland" that it deserved. Rather than learn its lesson, Ymros decided to raise a group of adventurers and steal back the abominable artifact. 
The global-warming-causing Island of Ymros
I may have filtered this description through 21st-century liberal sensibilities a bit. Character creation is nothing particularly new, allowing you to choose from only two classes (warriors and wizards) and five races (human, dwarf, troll, elf, and gnome). It's not quite that much of a choice, because dwarves and trolls can only be warriors and gnomes and elves can only be wizards. You get up to five characters in a party. Each character has a familiar set of statistics: speed, strength, intellect, endurance, attack skill, hit points, and spell points. These are rolled randomly but have modifiers based on race. You get to choose attributes to re-roll, but you can only re-roll three times. 
There is a bit of originality in the game in the way that you assign "skills" to your characters. In addition to sword, axe, mace, and different wizard skills, we have karate, dark vision, berserking, hunting, persuasiveness, and tactics (which allows you to identify what party member a monster is targeting). As I start the game, it appears that the skills are binary: either you have them or you don't; there's no ongoing skill development as in Wizard's Crown. I created one "paladinish" human warrior character (Roland) with sword, persuasion, and tactics skills, a standard dwarven fighter type with axe and berserking skills, and a troll brute with karate and armored skin. The spellcasters were more difficult. Spell skills take a lot of intelligence. I created an elven wizard with fire and wind abilities and a gnome wizard with metal, ice, and spirit magic. I always feel slightly lame creating a party with one of each race or one of each character class in a party-based CRPG, like I can't commit to any one theme. A bolder decision would have been to try an all-troll party or something. Why don't we agree that I'll do that when I get to games I've already played? 
The heroic anti-environmental crusaders.
Your party launches from the town of Green Hamlet, where, if you visit the bar, you can get what appears to be your first quest: the rescue of a priest from a local dungeon called Blackfort.
Wandering outdoors is much as in any top-down party-based game like Ultimas III and IV or Wizard's Crown. The difference is, Shard of Spring has some reasonably lame-for-the-era monochrome graphics. The sound is no better.
Combat, on the other hand, is interesting, featuring a tactical depth worthy of Wizard's Crown but without quite so many confounding options (but also no "quick combat" option). You move your characters around the battlefield to engage enemies with weapons or spells. Each character has a certain number of movement points (based on speed) that determine how far he can go and how many attacks he can make when he gets there.
The neat thing is that the combat map is a blown-up version of the game map. The screen shot below, for instance, is a dungeon combat in a room with a western door.
I don't have much time in, but I'm in the midst of exploring the first dungeon, hoping to find the kidnapped priest. Whether I "like" the game is going to hinge, I suspect, on how interesting the various encounters and role-playing choices are. SSI has been a mixed bag so far, with both games I found tedious (Wizard's Crown) and those I found interesting and fun (Phantasie). Here's hoping Shard of Spring turns out to be the latter. 


  1. shard of spring is a very mixed bag and is not fantastic but its ok. I dont remember if some of the places that train skills will give you new ones. You'll find places all around that train skills and they may impart new ones on characters that dont have em.

    SOS is a pretty small CRPG, and yeah for the time it was released regarding its competition its pretty bad graphics wise, text mode screens, gfx mode screens, etc. that shitty alternate font.

  2. I tried the C64 version earlier this year but gave up as it seemed to crash a lot. On the C64 version you also had to turn left and right before moving forward in combat which I found annoying. Hopefully the dos version will not suffer from these issues.

    I always wanted to try the game (despite the poor graphics) as I used to glance through a walkthrough that ZZapp64! magazine ran and it sounded quite an interesting game.

  3. Temple of Apshai on the C64 has the same control problems, made worse by the fact that the 'Turn Left' and 'Turn Right' commands are mapped to L and R.

    I used a PS2 controller via USB tho and if you map the movement controls to a d-pad, it's just like playing a Resident Evil game and is not nearly as annoying.

  4. I just noticed that your elven spellcaster only has 1 Hp. How exactly does the combat work, can you keep the spellcasters at the back and have them use ranged attacks against enemies, elsewise I can't see Grey Star surviving long.

  5. Note that having a diverse party configuration let's you see more of what the game has available - different attacks, different defenses, any particular race-based quests, etc.

    Admittedly, I don't think it matters much to me, anyway. I enjoy reading these posts, but I don't plan to play these old games myself, so it's not as though I need a thorough review.

  6. BLEAGHHH: My elven spellcaster only had 1HP when that screen shot was taken. His max was I think 8.

    ACRIN1/TAYLOR: Yes, the left/right turn is quite annoying. You have to be facing your enemies directly to attack, and every turn takes a movement point. Wizard's Crown had this, too. I think they did away with it in Pool of Radiance, but I don't remember for sure.

  7. I can't help noticing that while the graphic do indeed look "Lame-for-the-era", they aren't actually monochrome...

    1. Agreed. I wasn't very precise with my terminology during my first year or two.

  8. I am sure it is just a coincidence, but the Island of Ymros map has a passing resemblance to the Elder Scroll's Tamriel.

  9. The source code of the game would be interesting for compare with goldbox engine , the use of rules and stat Matrix, I swear the author free the code in QB


I welcome all comments about the material in this blog, and I generally do not censor them. However, please follow these rules:

1. Do not link to any commercial entities, including Kickstarter campaigns, unless they're directly relevant to the material in the associated blog posting. (For instance, that GOG is selling the particular game I'm playing is relevant; that Steam is having a sale this week on other games is not.) This also includes user names that link to advertising.

2. Please avoid profanity and vulgar language. I don't want my blog flagged by too many filters. I will delete comments containing profanity on a case-by-case basis.

3. NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. It makes it impossible to tell who's who in a thread. If you don't want to log in to Google to comment, either a) choose the "Name/URL" option, pick a name for yourself, and just leave the URL blank, or b) sign your anonymous comment with a preferred user name in the text of the comment itself.

4. I appreciate if you use ROT13 for explicit spoilers for the current game and upcoming games. Please at least mention "ROT13" in the comment so we don't get a lot of replies saying "what is that gibberish?"

5. Comments on my blog are not a place for slurs against any race, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, or mental or physical disability. I will delete these on a case-by-case basis depending on my interpretation of what constitutes a "slur."

Blogger has a way of "eating" comments, so I highly recommend that you copy your words to the clipboard before submitting, just in case.

I read all comments, no matter how old the entry. So do many of my subscribers. Reader comments on "old" games continue to supplement our understanding of them. As such, all comment threads on this blog are live and active unless I specifically turn them off. There is no such thing as "necro-posting" on this blog, and thus no need to use that term.

I will delete any comments that simply point out typos. If you want to use the commenting system to alert me to them, great, I appreciate it, but there's no reason to leave such comments preserved for posterity.

I'm sorry for any difficulty commenting. I turn moderation on and off and "word verification" on and off frequently depending on the volume of spam I'm receiving. I only use either when spam gets out of control, so I appreciate your patience with both moderation tools.