Sunday, September 19, 2010
Sword of Glass: Addendum (and Vacation Announcement)
11 comments:
I welcome all comments about the material in this blog, and I generally do not censor them. However, please follow these rules:
1. DO NOT COMMENT ANONYMOUSLY. If you do not want to log in or cannot log in with a Google Account, choose the "Name/URL" option and type a name (you can leave the URL blank). If that doesn't work, use the "Anonymous" option but put your name of choice at the top of the entry.
2. Do not link to any commercial entities, including Kickstarter campaigns, unless they're directly relevant to the material in the associated blog posting. (For instance, that GOG is selling the particular game I'm playing is relevant; that Steam is having a sale this week on other games is not.) This also includes user names that link to advertising.
3. Please avoid profanity and vulgar language. I don't want my blog flagged by too many filters. I will delete comments containing profanity on a case-by-case basis.
4. I appreciate if you use ROT13 for explicit spoilers for the current game and upcoming games. Please at least mention "ROT13" in the comment so we don't get a lot of replies saying "what is that gibberish?"
5. Comments on my blog are not a place for slurs against any race, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, or mental or physical disability. I will delete these on a case-by-case basis depending on my interpretation of what constitutes a "slur."
Blogger has a way of "eating" comments, so I highly recommend that you copy your words to the clipboard before submitting, just in case.
I read all comments, no matter how old the entry. So do many of my subscribers. Reader comments on "old" games continue to supplement our understanding of them. As such, all comment threads on this blog are live and active unless I specifically turn them off. There is no such thing as "necro-posting" on this blog, and thus no need to use that term.
I will delete any comments that simply point out typos. If you want to use the commenting system to alert me to them, great, I appreciate it, but there's no reason to leave such comments preserved for posterity.
I'm sorry for any difficulty commenting. I turn moderation on and off and "word verification" on and off frequently depending on the volume of spam I'm receiving. I only use either when spam gets out of control, so I appreciate your patience with both moderation tools.
I'm sure us readers won't begrudge you having to take some time away from the blog.
ReplyDeleteWith RPG games being quite big in general, I expect it's taken quite a lot of your time to keep us entertained, and it is much appreciated.
I don't know, I am afraid I have become addicted to CRPG Addict...
ReplyDeleteI'm a new reader and absolutely love what you're doing here. As someone who cut their teeth on the Bard's Tale and Wizardry games as a kid, I'm really enjoying reading your take on them as well as learning about new things I've never heard about.
ReplyDeleteSlightly bummed you didn't enjoy Autoduel, but coming up soon is another great Origin game by Chuckles: 2400 AD. I spent many hours of my youth figuring out and beating this game, so I'm looking forward to you giving it a shot. Truly one of the great games that seemingly no one has ever heard of in my opinion.
Yeah, don't ruin your career. I can barely keep up with READING these (plus all the other sites I try to visit), and I can just imagine how much time you must spend at this.
ReplyDeleteLots of fun reading your play-throughs though.
When do you think you will find time for the next update?
ReplyDeleteJust want to say that the concept of this blog is amazing. Good work, and good luck in your future endeavours.
ReplyDeleteBrian - thanks! I know nothing about "2400 A.D.", not even that it was an Origin game, so I'll look forward to it more. As for "Autoduel," whether I enjoy a game or not probably has as much to do with my mood on the day I first play it as anything else. That might just have been a bad week. I hate to leave it up to whim like that, but really, with over 1,000 games on the list, what else am I going to do?
ReplyDeleteElzair - tonight! Although it's not my best.
Ruber - Thanks. I really appreciate the readership.
For some reason I randomly thought of this game a few minutes ago and decided to do a search just in case someone else remembered it - which turned out to be good timing. I remember getting it in the late '80s or early '90s, probably from one of those companies that used to sell 5 1/4" disks of freeware/shareware by mail order. It was a game of its time, all right - there was no leading the player to fun by the nose. If you wanted fun, you'd have to fight for it! And die a lot. But it had a kind of quirky fascination to it that got me to sink many hours into working out what the hell was going on. I think I made it down to level 5 or 6, where it started to get really nasty, before I finally gave up. Thanks for the post!
ReplyDeleteThis game shows that interesting ideas can come from unlikely sources. But of course, it's still frustrating for you that you hadn't completely left the graphics of 1980 with this game. Anyway, the game might not even meet your own criteria for including them. It really looks like shareware.
ReplyDeleteI feel that you should absolutely replay this game at some point. It has all the great features that you list, and yet it's not beaten (although it can clearly be beaten) - and the reason for this is the early ambition of your blog to plow through games as fast as possible.
ReplyDeleteBased on pure historical value, I feel this one deserves more. Perhaps a few others too (not too many, I give you that).
I agree.
Delete